Use code MOM50 at checkout thru Mother’s Day to get 50% off any gift card for marketing services
- +1 512-591-8295
- [email protected]
- Mon - Fri 9:00 - 16:00
Use code MOM50 at checkout thru Mother’s Day to get 50% off any gift card for marketing services
AI can generate marketing ideas quickly, but strategy is not the same thing as generating options. Real strategy requires understanding psychology, positioning, operations, founder bandwidth, buyer behavior, decision fatigue, and long-term sustainability simultaneously. That’s why even entrepreneurs who are highly skilled at using AI still hire experienced strategists.
One of my ongoing Fractional CMO clients uses AI regularly in her business. Not casually, either. She has taken my courses on how to properly use AI, understands prompting well, and already knows firsthand how dramatically better AI outputs become when you guide them correctly. An important note, she also understands when using a real human works better than trying to rely upon AI. (Remember, I always say to treat AI like an unpaid, inexperienced intern … it’s not an expert).
Read more: AI is Not a Magic Wand; It’s Like an Inexperienced Intern That Needs an Expert
We have also been working together strategically for quite a while now, meeting roughly quarterly as part of her Fractional CMO consulting. Over the past year, those sessions have helped her narrow her focus, structure her offers more intentionally, and stop chasing disconnected ideas that looked good individually but did not actually work together as a cohesive business system.
That distinction matters because people love to dismiss bad AI outputs by saying, “Well, they just prompted it wrong.” That was not the situation here. This was a smart entrepreneur who understands both the strengths and limitations of AI tools.
After our recent session, I got curious. I wanted to see what ChatGPT would actually recommend to her if I fed it the same situation we had just discussed together. So I opened ChatGPT in an incognito browser window, without logging into my account, specifically so it would not have any context about me, my business, or the way I think strategically.
I gave ChatGPT a fairly detailed prompt about a community-based art gallery that hosts local events, allows artists to display work, and offers sponsorship opportunities for local businesses. The entrepreneur was specifically asking for help improving a “Patron of the Arts” package designed for businesses that wanted to support the local arts community while also displaying rotating artwork in their offices.
Honestly, the response sounded fairly reasonable at first glance. That’s exactly why this conversation matters.
The recommendations were not wildly stupid. They were actually fairly typical of what most entrepreneurs would probably consider “good business advice.” ChatGPT recommended adding additional package tiers, suggested adjusting the naming, and focused heavily on expanding the list of included features.
If someone was brainstorming from absolute scratch, some of that could genuinely be useful. AI is often excellent at helping entrepreneurs generate possibilities.
But strategy is not the same thing as generating possibilities.
ChatGPT’s first instinct was to expand the offer structure. It recommended creating additional pricing tiers, including a lower-cost entry option and a higher-priced premium version.
Where’s my facepalm emoji?
This is where experience immediately started conflicting with algorithmic prediction.
Years (years!) ago, I read about the psychology of excessive choice in one of Malcolm Gladwell’s books, and it permanently changed the way I think about offers, websites, menus, onboarding systems, and customer behavior. Entrepreneurs often assume that offering more choices increases the likelihood of a sale because there is “something for everyone.”
In reality, more choices often create more hesitation. I’ve watched this strategically in my own work since reading his recommendation and working with my own clients at all levels over the years.
Mor choices creates:
Very often, overwhelmed people make no decision at all. (Although technically even no choice is still a choice … it’s a “no”.)
That matters even more for solo entrepreneurs because the founder experiences the friction too. Every additional package has to be explained, maintained, marketed, compared, delivered, updated, and mentally tracked. The entrepreneur ends up carrying more operational complexity while the buyer ends up carrying more decision fatigue.
ChatGPT optimized for more options.
I optimized for less friction and load.
Those are not the same thing.
The entrepreneur’s original idea was to allow businesses to come into the gallery, browse all the artwork, and choose pieces they wanted displayed in their office.
On paper, that sounds charming.
In reality, it becomes exhausting for everyone involved. AI doesn’t understand mental or physical exhaustion because it doesn’t have a body.
A business owner walks into the space and suddenly has to evaluate dozens of pieces of artwork, imagine how they would look in an office environment, compare styles, ask questions about artists, narrow choices down internally, and debate preferences, sometimes even with business partners or staff. Meanwhile, the founder now spends huge amounts of time walking every potential client through every possible option.
That operational burden is exactly the kind of thing AI often misses because AI does not have lived entrepreneurial experience. It does not naturally think about what repeated execution looks like six months later when the entrepreneur is already wearing 800 hats and mentally exhausted.
This is one of the biggest gaps I see with entrepreneurs relying too heavily on AI for strategy. Something may sound perfectly reasonable on a computer screen while being completely miserable in real-life execution.
Instead of framing the offer as “come choose your artwork,” I told her to reposition it as a curated art placement experience.
That single shift changed the entire psychological positioning of the offer.
Now the business is no longer wandering through a gallery trying to make aesthetic decisions from endless options. Instead, the entrepreneur curates five pieces specifically for that business (or more, or less), the business selects three, and if they dislike all five, she simply revises the selection.
Immediately, several hidden problems disappear at once.
The buyer experiences less overwhelm because the decision becomes manageable. The founder experiences less operational drag because she is no longer conducting lengthy walk-throughs for every potential client. The offer feels more premium because curation itself implies expertise and intentionality.
I also recommended that she handle transportation and installation whenever possible because that further reinforces the feeling of a concierge-level experience. If self-installation became necessary for any reason, then we discussed adding a damage disclaimer to protect the artist’s work and her business.
That is the type of layered thinking entrepreneurs often mistake for “just marketing advice.”
It is not just marketing advice. It is operational sustainability, buyer psychology, positioning, customer experience, and founder energy management all happening simultaneously.
This is the distinction entrepreneurs desperately need to understand right now. AI tends to optimize the visible layer of a business:
Experienced strategists often spend more time optimizing the invisible layer:
Those invisible layers are frequently what actually determine whether a business model becomes sustainable or quietly burns the entrepreneur out.
That was true throughout this entire consultation.
Once we repositioned the package correctly, we started layering in additional strategic elements that transformed the offer from “office artwork” into something much larger psychologically.
I recommended adding mini artist bios next to each displayed piece so visitors and employees could connect with the people behind the artwork. We discussed QR codes beside each piece so someone visiting the office could instantly learn more about the artist or even purchase work themselves.
Then we moved into storytelling and visibility.
I recommended social media posts showing the artwork being installed at the business location while tagging both the artist and the business. (Pssst … tagging your community partners on social media is a great way to get in front of new audiences, almost exactly the same as if you paid for pay-per-click advertising … but it’s free!) I suggested video clips where the artist discusses the inspiration behind the piece while mentioning how excited they are to have their work displayed at that specific local business.
That changes the entire emotional positioning of the offer.
Now the business is not just renting decorations for an office wall. They are publicly supporting local artists, participating in community storytelling, creating social engagement opportunities, and positioning themselves as an active cultural supporter in the community.
That is a very different experience psychologically.
Patrons have emotional reasons why they buy. AI doens’t have emotions and missed out on adding some VIP-style experiences:
Again, AI might interpret those as “more package bonuses.” But that is not what they actually are strategically.
Those elements create emotional investment, belonging, exclusivity, and identity reinforcement. They make people feel connected to something larger than a transaction.
Entrepreneurs often underestimate how much business decisions are driven by identity and emotional positioning instead of pure logic. Experienced strategists think about those layers constantly because those layers directly affect retention, referrals, perceived value, and long-term loyalty.
And, most importantly, for the ones I recommended, they will not be adding any additional work to my client.
Increasing the emotional perception of the patron while stabilizing the entrepreneur’s effort. Yes, please.
This is another place where AI fundamentally operates differently than experienced strategic consulting. AI can only work within the exact parameters you give it.
I never work that way.
Before our meeting even started, I had already reviewed her updated website, because I do not look at isolated business pieces separately. No silo here. I always look holistically at how the business ecosystem works together.
The website itself actually had some good improvements already. The events were prominently featured near the top of the homepage, which made sense because events are visible, community-facing activity.
But the deeper participation opportunities were buried. The things that actually bring her money to sustain her business. The actual revenue-driving involvement pathways:
Were much harder to find and both psychologically and visually secondary. That is not just a “website issue.” That is a positioning issue.
So I recommended adding to her navigation and creating clearer identity-based pathways for different types of people:
That framing matters because people are often buying identity before they are buying services. “What can I become here?” is psychologically much stronger than “What can I purchase here?”
Read more: Be vs Buy: How and Why Identity-Driven Brands Build Unshakeable Loyalty
Again, this is the type of systems-level thinking AI usually misses because it only answers the direct question being asked. It does not naturally zoom out and analyze the larger ecosystem unless someone explicitly instructs it to do so. (Or, alternately, when it does zoom out, it takes you down 20 rabbit holes that strategically you should have never considered in the first place.)
We also discussed the nonprofit side of the organization she was planning, and the exact same pattern showed up there too. The entrepreneur was naturally thinking about tangible support:
All important things.
But decades of nonprofit experience immediately made me think about unrestricted operating support because I know that is where nonprofits struggle long-term.
Supplies can frequently be secured through local grants or targeted community donations because people like funding visible, tangible items. General operating expenses are much harder because they are less emotionally exciting to donors, even though they are often what determine whether an organization survives.
So we discussed creating:
That recommendation did not come from “better AI prompting.” It came from decades of lived experience understanding nonprofit operational realities. And that is the important distinction entrepreneurs need to understand in the AI era.
Sometimes you do not even know the right questions to ask yet.
AI is an incredible tool. I use it. My clients use it. But there is a massive difference between generating ideas and understanding which ideas actually fit this specific entrepreneur, this specific business model, this specific buyer psychology, and this specific operational reality.
That still requires human judgment.
And in many cases, the most valuable thing an experienced strategist does is help entrepreneurs see the problems they do not yet realize they are solving.
The interesting part is that none of this looked dramatic from the outside. We were not rebuilding an entire company. We were not launching a massive ad campaign. We were not creating some complicated funnel with twenty moving parts.
We were identifying hidden friction points that were quietly affecting buyer behavior, founder workload, positioning, emotional perception, and long-term sustainability.
That is what real strategic consulting often looks like.
And honestly, this is where many entrepreneurs misunderstand who a Fractional CMO is actually for. You may hear the term and assume that it’s only for large corporations.
But the work I do focuses on entrepreneurs, and bringing my level of expertise, that traditionally only those big guys can afford, to the entrepreneurs who don’t have access to that same level of resources.
So yes, a Fractional CMO session is even for you. And friendly for your budget.
When you’re doing a lot but results still feel unpredictable, the problem isn’t effort.
In a focused one-on-one strategy session, we’ll identify what’s blocking progress, what to stop doing, and what deserves your attention next.
First strategy session available at one-time intro rate. Limited availability.
When everything feels messy, it’s almost always because one underlying issue is creating a dozen visible symptoms.
Find the real constraint in a 1:1 session so effort finally turns into momentum instead of more noise.
Your first strategy session is available at one-time intro rate. Limited availability.
More effort won’t fix misaligned focus.
Use a 1-on-1 strategy session to get clear on what’s actually helping, what’s quietly holding you back, and where attention will make the biggest difference right now.
Your first strategy session is available at one-time intro rate. Limited availability.
Scattered systems create fragile results.
In a 1-on-1 marketing strategy session you will see how the pieces should actually work together so progress doesn’t collapse the moment you stop pushing.
Your first strategy session is available at one-time intro rate. Limited availability.
Clarity isn’t about more ideas. It’s about knowing which moves matter now, which can wait, and which should never have been on the list.
Expertise will help you focus on what matters first in a 1-on-1 marketing strategy session.
Your first strategy session is available at one-time intro rate. Limited availability.
As Seen In
