Use code MOM50 at checkout thru Mother’s Day to get 50% off any gift card for marketing services
AI-generated content often looks good at first glance. The sentences flow. The structure is clean. The tone sounds professional. And on the surface, it feels like it should work.
But for many businesses, it quietly does the opposite. Not because AI writes “bad” content, most of what it writes is decent.
AI content can hurt your business because it misses the deeper strategic and psychological layers that actually make marketing work. The kinds of things most business owners don’t realize they’re doing wrong until someone points directly at it.
If you’ve ever used AI to write your website copy, service descriptions, emails, or social posts and thought, “This sounds fine, but it’s not bringing in customers,” this is why.
Here are some of the more common things I point out to entrepreneurs about their content, changes that will make it stronger:
AI loves contrast statements. You’ve seen them everywhere:
For example: “It’s not bad marketing, it’s missing strategy.”
Technically, there’s nothing wrong with that sentence. But strategically, it’s weaker than it needs to be.
Here’s why: when someone reads that sentence, their brain processes “bad marketing” first. You’ve now planted the very idea you’re trying to move them away from. The contrast forces the reader to mentally juggle both concepts instead of landing firmly on the one that matters.
I don’t want you to focus on bad marketing! Actually I don’t want you to focus on missing strategy either lol … well I do but not in that way, it’s hard for me even to write the ineffective contrast statements, but you get what I’m saying.
This is similar to one of the recommendations we regularly made to parents of young children when I worked in nonprofit and presented parenting groups for all of those years. If you needed young children to hear you, you need to remove the negative phrasing. If they are trying to run into the middle of the street, it’s much less effective to yell “don’t run!” … because all the kid hears is the action / verb: run! Instead, you yell “stop!” because then when the kiddo only hears the action statement, it’s the right one.
At a fundamental level, our brains don’t really change that much away from focusing most on the action words, even when we are adults, professionals, entrepreneurs.
A human expert would often tighten that phrasing from “It’s not bad marketing. It’s missing strategy” to:
“It’s missing strategy.”
Shorter. Clearer. More confident.
AI doesn’t know when the contrast adds clarity and when it dilutes impact. Human experts do.
If you’ve ever left AI-written contrast statements untouched because they sounded reasonable, this is one of the subtle places your message loses strength without you realizing it. Some of these work great as a contrast, and others remove the desired impact.
These are the kinds of statements non-marketing business owners regularly publish after using AI:
The direct versions are easier to understand and easier to believe. AI defaults to the first because it mirrors how small businesses try not to sound salesy.
A human editor knows when that caution is actually hurting clarity.
One of the most common AI content failures shows up on service pages and “About” sections. AI defaults to talking about the business.
You’ve seen this directly in real offers where the copy talks extensively about the provider and what they have or do, but barely addresses you … the person reading it.
And yes, credibility matters. Experience matters. Definitely. But when the wording stays centered on the business instead of the customer, something subtle happens. The reader’s brain disengages.
I have talked about this for years, that your content needs to be customer-centric. Because subconsciously, they’re asking one question: “What does this change for me?” … the WIIFM (what’s in it for me) concept, widely attributed to Yale psychologist Victor Vroom although it’s actually been around a lot longer than that.
AI doesn’t naturally reframe expertise in terms of customer outcomes. It stacks paragraphs about the business while leaving the reader to connect the dots themselves.
If you’ve ever read your own website copy and thought, “This explains us well, but people still aren’t calling,” this is often why.
A human expert knows how to shift the framing without removing credibility.
These are extremely common AI-generated statements non-marketers publish:
The original versions aren’t necessarily wrong they’re just inward-facing. AI writes them because that’s how most business websites sound. (Sometimes the 90% of the crap on the internet, right?)
Human intervention flips the focus to the customer’s reality.
AI is excellent at listing features. It will describe services, steps, tools, timelines, deliverables, and processes in great detail. What it struggles with is leading with benefits.
Not because benefits are complicated, but because benefits require understanding what actually matters to a customer in context. It’s brain vs heart.
And this is critical: AI should never be asked to figure out the benefit on its own. Or, well … not at all. You tell it the benefit, not the other way around.
If you haven’t defined the benefit yourself, AI will guess. And even when it tries to guess, it often misses what the customer actually cares about. Because AI doesn’t understand “care” because it isn’t alive!
You’ll see phrases like:
“This saves time.”
“This improves efficiency.”
“This helps your business grow.”
All technically benefits. All vague.
A human expert understands how to connect a feature to a real, lived outcome, and then present the outcome first. Benefits before features.
If you’ve ever published AI-written content that explained what your service includes but didn’t make people want it, this is often the reason.
Feature-heavy AI copy from non-marketers often looks like this:
Without a human defining the benefit first, AI usually stops at the feature and assumes the value is obvious. If the value were always obvious, entrepreneurs wouldn’t need me, right?
AI can talk about pain points all day.
It will name them accurately. It will structure them cleanly.
But it does not understand those pain points. It doesn’t feel them. Because … yes, you know why, it can’t feel pain. Or anything.
So while the pain points sound technically correct, they don’t always land. A human expert knows when pain points are too generic to resonate.
These are common AI-generated headlines non-marketers publish:
They’re not wrong. They’re just … meh … forgettable.
Compare that to pain points grounded in real experience (and how you can tell):
AI doesn’t know which pain actually keeps someone stuck. Humans do.
This is one of the most damaging ways AI content fails businesses.
AI is very good at tactics. It can suggest posting schedules, email frequency, website sections, blog ideas, and promotional formats. That’s because tactics are widely documented. (On that 90% of the internet that is 90% crap … keep that in mind).
Strategy is different. Strategy depends on what you’re trying to achieve, what stage your business is in, who your customers actually are, and why certain choices make sense for you and not someone else.
AI cannot understand why a strategy exists. It cannot connect business goals to intentional decisions. AI can only repeat patterns.
That’s how businesses end up with marketing that looks active but doesn’t work together. It’s not integrated. If you’ve ever felt like you’re doing “everything you’re supposed to do” and still not seeing results, this is often why.
Non-marketer businesses often end up with:
AI can help produce all of that. It cannot tell you whether it makes sense as a whole.
This isn’t about punctuation, like an em dash, and everyone saying ‘oh look, you used an em dash, must be written by AI’. I love my em dashes. And en dashes, and semicolons, colons and more. I’ve been using them since I was taking journalism courses long, long ago.
It’s not about sentence length. AI loves to create 3 to 5 word sentences that are each a paragraph all alone, followed by another, and another. Like bullet points without the bullets.
It’s not about whether something sounds “AI-written.” Those are surface-level distractions.
The real issue is how the content functions.
AI content can quietly fail a business while sounding perfectly professional. And that’s what makes it dangerous. Most business owners won’t realize what’s wrong unless someone points to the underlying issue.
Many business owners do review their AI content. They read it. They make a few edits. They approve it. If you’re not doing that minimum level of oversight, please stop now and go do so.
But if you’re not experienced in marketing strategy and customer psychology, you may not always see the problems outlined here. You may only feel that something isn’t working after it’s not quite working.
That’s where the biggest missed opportunities live.
Small changes in framing, focus, benefits, and clarity can dramatically change results. AI won’t suggest those changes. And without expertise, most businesses aren’t making them, either.
That’s why AI content always needs human expert intervention.
If your marketing content looks fine but isn’t bringing in customers, the issue is rarely the writing itself. It’s what AI can’t see, and what only experience can.
Want a review of some content to see if it's as strong as you need it to be?
Schedule a call and we can discuss what content you need reviewed and what your goal for the content is.
As Seen In
